Fort Reno Reservoir green roof. Photo courtesy of DC Water. |
"Green infrastructure refers to the biological process of using soil and plants to treat water naturally," said Gary Belen, senior director of the clean water supply program at American Rivers, a national non-profit conservation organization in Washington, D.C., dedicated to protecting and restoring America's rivers. And these systems provide many financial, environmental and regulatory benefits. These natural water management solutions capture the stormwater long enough to allow plants and soil to soak it up like a sponge, which helps these plants, naturally filters out non-point pollutants, and lightens the load on urban stormwater systems and overflow basins. This is especially important in crowded urban environments where the pervasiveness of impermeable roadways, buildings and other non-porous surfaces increases the volume of stormwater runoff, which can lead to overflows in combined sewer and stormwater systems.
Tom Barrett, president of Green Water Infrastructure Consulting in Indianapolis, Ind., noted that more than 179 municipalities in the U.S. have some level of combined storm and sewer system, and many of them are struggling to accommodate EPA requirements to eliminate these overflow episodes. "Green infrastructure can be a less expensive and more effective solution than a massive civil works project," he said. And they can be scaled up or down based on the changing needs of the community. This means that they can be adapted to accommodate growth in urban development or the increased frequency or severity of storm systems. "You can't do that with a 20-year gray infrastructure system," he added.
Green infrastructure also provides ancillary benefits, including more shade, reduction of heat islands, animal habitats, and overall beautification of the city. These societal benefits can have a big impact on public buy-in for infrastructure investment, said Rosey Jencks, head of the urban watershed management and stormwater planning program for San Francisco's Public Utilities Commission. "When cities invest in gray infrastructure, people can't see the benefit, but green infrastructure exists in the community space," she said.
However, it is important to note that green infrastructure is not a replacement for gray infrastructure. No one is suggesting that cities tear down water treatment facilities and replace them with porous forests and rain gardens, Belen said. "It isn't a juxtaposition between gray and green," he explained. "We find that they can both be more effective when used together."
Counting Every Drop
Green infrastructure is becoming a popular trend in the sustainable cities movement, with urban leaders rolling out various projects across their cities as a way to cost-effectively manage stormwater while benefitting from the public image that comes with going green.
Philadelphia was one of the early adopters in this movement, rolling out an $800-million green infrastructure plan in 2013 that includes dozens of rain gardens, infiltration beds and porous pavement alleys and driveways throughout the city. Though Philly is far from alone: In recent years, other major cities, including Chicago, San Francisco, New York, Denver, and Washington, D.C., have rolled out their own green infrastructure plans in the quest to solve combined sewer overflow issues without adding massive new treatment facilities.
The projects themselves are relatively simple. They often require simply reworking corner parks and boulevards into rain gardens and replacing blacktop roads and roofs with more absorbent alternatives.